By Gabriel Nkunika
After watching the replay of Saturday’s match between Zambia and Burundi at Levy Mwanawasa Stadium, I feel there are serious questions that need to be asked about the Chipolopolo Boys.
Zambia have played three matches so far, recording one win, one draw and one defeat. These are not the results expected of a team with ambitions of qualifying for the next AFCON.
Much of the frustration among supporters following yesterday’s draw came from the expectation that Zambia would collect maximum points against an opponent like Burundi not underrating them but Chipolopolo has more history with the AFCON and are just a bigger football nation.
However, the performance on the day told a different story. Burundi looked more organised and, in several moments, more threatening than the hosts. Even the half-time statistics showed the visitors registering more shots on target than Zambia.
SO WHERE DID WE GO WRONG?
Firstly, the tactical setup was questionable. Zambia did not look properly organised to deal with Burundi’s approach. While Burundi may not have better individual players than Zambia, their coach appeared to have a clearer tactical plan and got his players organised.
Secondly, the midfield was a major concern. There was little coordination between the defence, midfield and attack. Zambia had four attacking players but lacked a recognised attacking midfielder to link the play and create opportunities. How do we expect our forwards to deliver when there is no proper creative connection between the midfield and attack?
Having more attacking players does not necessarily mean having a better attack.
Squad selection also raises questions.
Edward Chilufya, Prince Mumba and Derrick Bulaya for instance, were all not part of the initial squad and only received late call-ups following injuries to other players, yet they all started the match.
This raises questions about the original selection and the technical bench’s assessment of the available players.
Thirdly, FAZ must look at the structure and commitment of the technical bench. Both the head coach and his assistant have responsibilities at local clubs. In my view, this creates a potential conflict of interest and raises questions about whether they can give the national team the full attention it requires, particularly when it comes to monitoring players and preparing adequately.
If FAZ has identified these two coaches to lead the Chipolopolo, then give them the necessary contracts and allow them to concentrate on the national team.
Coaching the national team should be a responsibility that demands full commitment.
Ultimately, Zambia’s problems cannot be solved by simply changing a few players or blaming individual performances. We need tactical organisation, proper squad selection, a balanced midfield and a technical bench with a clear vision.
The Chipolopolo have ambitions of returning to the AFCON stage, but ambitions alone are not enough. There must be a clear plan, proper execution and accountability.
